Need a Base? You Might Not Be a Nomad

In eleven years of full-time travel — 120-something countries, no fixed address — Lisa and I have never seriously considered getting a home base.

Not once.

Not after a rough month. Not after a bad Airbnb. Not when friends asked where we "actually live." The answer has always been the same: we live wherever we are right now. Tomorrow we'll live somewhere else.

This makes us unusual, even among nomads. The standard arc goes something like this: you leave home, you travel hard for a year or two, you slow down, and then you rent an apartment in Nice or Chiang Mai or Medellin and call it your base. You keep traveling, but you have a place to come back to. Somewhere with your winter coat and your spare charger and maybe a decent coffee setup.

It sounds reasonable. It sounds like the mature version of the lifestyle.

I think it's a trap.

A clarification before I make the case: I'm not talking about renting somewhere for three or four months and then moving on. That's just slow travel. Spending a season in Oaxaca and then heading to Portugal isn't having a base — it's nomadism at a different tempo. What I'm talking about is the permanent home base. The apartment you keep year-round, the place you always return to, the address that gradually becomes the center of gravity for a life that was supposed to be in motion.

Nomad or Expat — Pick One

After a decade in this world, I've noticed something: the words "nomad" and "expat" get used interchangeably, and the confusion isn't just semantic. It's shaping decisions.

A lot of people who call themselves nomads are actually shopping for a city. They're comparing Lisbon to Medellin to Chiang Mai, ranking cost of living and cafe culture and visa rules, running a search algorithm for the best place to settle. That's not nomadism. That's apartment hunting with a longer commute.

Getting a home base doesn't optimize your nomad life. It converts you into an expat who likes to travel. Those are two different things, and there's nothing wrong with being an expat — but you should know which one you are before you sign a lease.

An expat with a base pays rent on a place whether they're in it or not. They have utility accounts, maybe local tax obligations. They accumulate furniture and kitchen gear and that one lamp they found at the market. They start thinking about the apartment when they're away from it. Did I leave the window open? Is the landlord handling that leak? Should I go back for the summer because the place is just sitting there?

That gravitational pull is the whole thing a nomad life is designed to avoid.

The Real Math

Our accommodation costs run $1,400 to $4,000 a month depending on where we are. A comparable rental in any U.S. city we'd actually want to live in costs about the same. But most people miss the real math: a base isn't instead of your travel housing. It's in addition to it. You're still paying for wherever you're staying on the road. A base roughly doubles your housing cost for the privilege of having an empty apartment somewhere.

Add property insurance, utilities, furnishing, maintenance, and the slow creep of stuff that accumulates in any space with a closet, and the math gets worse fast.

The Logistics Are Solved Problems

When people argue for a base, they usually point to logistics. Where does your mail go? What about healthcare? Don't you need a real address?

We're domiciled in Florida — no state income tax, commercial mail forwarding service, everything scanned and emailed. Driver's license, voter registration, banking: all of it works with a Florida address that isn't a house we live in. It's been this way for over a decade. Nothing has broken.

Healthcare is the question people expect to be the dealbreaker. Lisa carries a Blue Cross Blue Shield plan with global coverage. I'm on Medicare supplemented by an international travel medical plan. Last year I walked into a clinic in Eastern Europe with a problem that would have meant a $200 copay and a three-week wait for a specialist back home. I paid $35, saw the doctor that afternoon, and was done in an hour. A fixed address wouldn't have improved any part of that experience.

What People Actually Want

So the math doesn't work and the logistics are solved. Why does the pull toward a base remain so strong?

Because a base makes the lifestyle feel like something you can point at. A visa, an insurance policy, a lease — these are tangible. They're documents. They turn "I travel full-time" into something that looks more like a life structure and less like an extended vacation. That impulse is understandable. A life with no fixed address and no visible infrastructure can feel thin, even when it works perfectly well.

The problem is that the impulse leads people to buy solutions to problems they don't actually have. A lease doesn't solve a logistical gap — it creates one. But it feels like building something, and that feeling is hard to argue with.

There are real costs to perpetual motion that I won't pretend don't exist. Decision fatigue is one — in the early years, the constant "where will I sleep, where's the grocery store, is the Wi-Fi going to work" takes genuine mental energy. But it's a problem that solves itself. You build systems. You learn what you need from a listing. By year four or five, the cognitive load of moving is roughly the same as the cognitive load of staying. The other real cost is community. It's hard to maintain deep, proximity-based friendships when you leave every few weeks. That's a trade-off of the lifestyle itself, though — not a problem a base fixes. You can have a lease in Lisbon and still not know your neighbors.

Younger nomads pair a base with a digital nomad visa and the combination transforms "I'm taking a year off" into "I live in Greece." That feels like a bigger deal, even when the practical difference is negligible. Most of them have also never dealt with property — never had a landlord who won't fix the heat, never been locked into a twelve-month lease, never spent a Saturday arguing with a contractor. Managing a place is a part-time job nobody warns you about until you're in it. (Some of this group is also gearing up for kids, which is a real reason — the only logistical argument for a base that I can't poke holes in.)

Older nomads who came to this late have a different version of the same pull. They've always had a key on their ring that opened a door they owned or rented. The drift feels wrong — not because it is wrong, but because it's unfamiliar. A base lets them be adventurous without being unanchored. That's a reasonable instinct. I just think there are cheaper ways to feel settled.

And then there's the comparison instinct, which cuts across every age group. Rank the cities, weigh the options, pick the best one. Porto vs. Playa del Carmen. Beach vs. mountains. The whole exercise assumes the goal is to find the right place, when the actual goal of nomadism is to stop looking for one.

I've watched people agonize for months over which city to base in — reading forums, running spreadsheets, visiting candidates — and then sign a lease and feel restless within six weeks. The apartment didn't fix the restlessness. It just gave it an address. Wherever you go, there you are.

What You Actually Give Up

Nobody talks about what a base costs you beyond money.

A base kills spontaneity. You can't move on a whim when you're thinking about the apartment sitting empty. You can't jump on the cheap fare that popped up this morning because you've got a lease pulling you back in six weeks. You can't avoid tax complications when you've established residency in a place with its own rules about how long you can be gone before you owe them something.

A base turns movement into departure. Every trip becomes a trip from somewhere, with a return date attached. That's a fundamentally different relationship with travel than the one Lisa and I have, where there's no departure and no return — just the next place.

If you're gearing up for kids, or you need to be near aging parents, or you're managing a health condition that requires continuity of care at a specific facility — these trade-offs might be worth it. Those are life-stage realities, not failures of commitment. But if your reason for wanting a base is vaguer than that — a feeling, an instinct, a sense that you're supposed to settle down eventually — it's worth asking what exactly you think the apartment is going to solve.

We're in year eleven. We just kept going.